<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Ghost Blogging Controversy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.author-izer.com/2006/02/ghost-blogging-controversy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.author-izer.com/2006/02/ghost-blogging-controversy/</link>
	<description>Sallie Goetsch</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:21:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: indyotto</title>
		<link>http://www.author-izer.com/2006/02/ghost-blogging-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>indyotto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fileslinger.com/authorizer/articleblog/2006/02/the-ghost-blogging-controversy/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>This is a good topic, as I&#039;m currently wrestling with the whole corporate blogging thing with a client. I&#039;m still trying to gather up my pennies, but there seems to be a difference between ghostwriting an article and a corporate blog. At least I perceive a difference.

Part of that stems from the notion that a publication for which an article is ghostwritten has a different &quot;feel.&quot; A blog, by contrast, is a more personal, interactive form of communication. My concern is if I, for example, ghostwrite a CEO&#039;s blog that I, in effect, become responsible for all interactions at the site with readers.

Perhaps the immediacy of a blog changes the scope for me.

Like I said, I&#039;m still wrestling with it. As a PR professional I counsel clients to be forthright and up front. I can coach them how to respond to issues and questions, but I feel it&#039;s best if the client speaks directly to it.

I&#039;m still trying to find that line with a blog, since to many people the very nature of a blog is a personal connection.

Thanks for addressing the issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a good topic, as I&#8217;m currently wrestling with the whole corporate blogging thing with a client. I&#8217;m still trying to gather up my pennies, but there seems to be a difference between ghostwriting an article and a corporate blog. At least I perceive a difference.</p>
<p>Part of that stems from the notion that a publication for which an article is ghostwritten has a different &#8220;feel.&#8221; A blog, by contrast, is a more personal, interactive form of communication. My concern is if I, for example, ghostwrite a CEO&#8217;s blog that I, in effect, become responsible for all interactions at the site with readers.</p>
<p>Perhaps the immediacy of a blog changes the scope for me.</p>
<p>Like I said, I&#8217;m still wrestling with it. As a PR professional I counsel clients to be forthright and up front. I can coach them how to respond to issues and questions, but I feel it&#8217;s best if the client speaks directly to it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m still trying to find that line with a blog, since to many people the very nature of a blog is a personal connection.</p>
<p>Thanks for addressing the issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
